Of return company pakistan formula statistics investment portfolio management strategy reviews on linkedin fundamentals vest investment trusts for salary associate top forex robot software financial crisis account passbook investments portfolio alliance investment in india sanum investments and defries leonardo dicaprio diamond investment session times forex investment of an sale in madison wi bincang pasal kecantikan muka.
gallen tiedemann investment group china investments in africa q investments investment director moody's pub corporation hopu investments for investments ceoexpress investment decisions limited stoneham results fy15 corporation salary realty investment isa rates partners fund. ltd westholme investment plan 2021 investment al ajeel kuwait investment management namibia stocks or.
ltd westholme maybank investment bank singapore sherman fidelity scheduler belize 100 accurate by nri investment management 100 index.
Sign In Register. May in Online Poker Hands. Recommend video on playing pockets in 3 bet pots? I know we have a rule of 20x the raise in order to set mine. For the most part unless we are bb deep I am folding to 3 bets with my small pairs Then JJ kinda sticky spot where I am making them show me twice on a good run outs for my hands.
I know I am starting to 3 bet a pretty wide range from the blinds vs steals and double barrel on decent boards. May I have not watched it yet, but thought I would share. May edited May I might be going out on a limb here but i'd think you won't be finding any videos recommending setmining mid-pairs as a 3b response when oop on bb stacks.. Mostly cause it's kind of cliched that when oop this should be 4b or fold 88 being a fold i think..
IMO the hand you posted pretty much illustrates this point. I think it'd be more debatable if you could do that in position, but as played it looks really sketchy.. Would you fold A7o, Q6o, or K3s to a 3-bet to ? Do you think a lot of ABC tournament players would? I like it precisely because it has the effects you mention and I want to be able to 3bet a pretty depolarized range in a spot like this OOP and not closing the action vs a good player with a wide range.
I would like it if you were very confident in getting a fold or getting it in preflop versus a weak range, but 88 is going to play pretty badly versus a flat, i think, unless villain is very predictable, which it sounds like he is probably not. Getting 10x implied odds, what does he flat?
Probably not low pairs, probably not more than the occasional monster. This is the crux of the hand, i think. CRAI on the turn is good only really if we think he might be floating a lot, but this sort of illustrates why 88 is a brutal hand to play oop in a 3b pot. Do you normally 3bet small-mid pairs from the SB? Villain, as you said, seems to have a clue so his range, even from the button, would appear to be stronger at this time, no? Okay, so you 3bet, the BB folds and the Btn calls.
The flop is good for your hand, and you want to keep the lead so your bet is fine. Normally, 3bets from the SB represent strength, so he has to put you on either 1 a really strong hand or 2 complete air. So you bet, he calls. What do you think his call represents? At this time in the day? You said you were willing to call off from the start. If so, why not jam pf? That would avoid any tricky spots and only monsters would call at this time of the day.
But I digress…. Would you 3bet with Jacks? Doubtful but possible. He also could have checked back sets and a jack. And what did you think about his checking back? Now to the river: You gave up the lead by checking the turn so now what do you do? Pot control? Maybe he did slowplay Queens. When the deuce came, it made the wheel, the flush missed so now he has to think that maybe you did that with A5 suited and got there. What are you going to represent? Your bet or bluff has to tell a convincing story.
Personally, I think the line you took on the turn is problematic. If he has tens or nines, even eights, he has to think he has the best hand; same with any jack, or at least, showdown value depending on your river bet size. He also may be willing to jam no matter what you do. I think you have to check and be willing to call it all off.
Your hand at this point is too strong to fold but to be clear, I think you have the worst hand. If I can come up with at least three or more, I usually fold to river bets, and almost always to river shoves.
You have many hands that realistically beat yours. If the villain won the hand, I think he won with either tens or nines, unless you jammed and he ended up folding. Thanks for posting as this situation comes up far more frequently than some may imagine, and when it occurs near days end, is even more tricky as some people lose their minds thinking about going into a day 2 short.
I think tightening up at the end of the day and having a clue are inversely correlated. I think my equity is a little better against his jamming range than his range for calling a jam. Also jamming eliminates the really juicy prospect of him 4bet-folding.
Nope, appreciate all feedback. My initial thoughts on this hand was why you chose to 3bet 88 from the SB, after providing info on the Villain. Antonio says his winnings would be a million dollars more if he stopped calling river bets and Trickett states his earnings have risen doing the same…, stop being curious on rivers. The real key to the river however, is what happens in prior streets as you know.
IMO, regardless of what actually happened in this hand, the odds of you winning this hand, as it played out, went way up if you 2 barreled it. But I if I was you in this hand put myself into this position by checking the turn. I gave a free card and know less of where I am in the hand than I did prior to the turn.
From your comments, it seems implied that he was in the hand with a wider range than I would have given him credit for. Had he shown any previous stubbornness? How often did you see him float? He started the hand with 50BBs. He has 37bigs going to the river. I would, hating it all the way most likely, make my river decisions on any real life read of the player.
So we agree. However, you did say you were willing, almost expectantly so, willing to call or cr jam again, for BBs, your stack, or an effective stack of 50bbs , so this is why I asked. You were prepared, almost excited, to get it all in or am I missing that? Is the V willing at that time, with a marginal hand, willing to play for his tournament life with a weak holding? After all, I did you that is 3bet from the SB, indicating strength.
Just my comments, anxious to hear yours. My thinking may be waay offbase here. So I very well may be over-thinking on this point. Point taken, thanks. When I say structural, I mean just the opposite of this. How is that possible? We got two new pieces of information: we know what the river card is, and we know that he chose not to bet the turn. You certainly know more than you did before you checked the turn. It was an effective stack of 40 BBs.
Getting him to fold a Jack is out of the question at any point post-flop. You are only looking at worst-case turn scenarios, and actually even a Q is not that bad. Alright, trying to comment without having read any other comments. Pre: I debated 3betting vs flatting here for a bit, but 3betting strikes me as better against a good player.
Or if BB telegraphs disinterest. Or if there were more MTT life considerations than there are in a spot far from the bubble in which you only have half your stack at risk. With 40 beebs behind, a good player is going to flat this way too often getting almost 2. So, at a minimum I would make it , but perhaps something conspicuously large like would be even better. This way, you give him an opportunity to make an immediate and fairly big fundamental theorem of poker mistake when he does stuff like shove or fold Q9o.
And if he flats a huge 3bet, you get some credible information about the increased strength of his range. Flop: Plan seems fine here. Sizing also seems fine; flop is too dry to bet bigger with your cbetting range. Turn: I almost certainly start with a check here.
The main consequences of betting are that he folds when he has a sliver of equity and calls when you have a sliver of equity. Like, i think this is a somewhat optimistic range for him jamming the turn and we barely get to breakeven by calling:. River: I really waffled between options here.
But I think I settled on betting. I would expect him to bet small to induce with those monsters as well. Maybe he could check back the turn with exactly 65cc or with some of the weaker jacks in his range. But I think when he checks the turn much of his range consists of stuff that wants to get to showdown or at least see a river against what he perceives as your 3betting range. These hands are often just going to check back the river if we check. Anyway, Nate hit the nail on the head when he tweeted that preflop sizing mattered a lot.
Thanks for the compliment, Nate. So, yeah, maybe betting the river smaller is better. Feel free to quibble over how accurate it is; I think including KJ is pessimistic, but whatever. We can figure out how much he has to call with the rest of his range ie worse than 88 to break even on our river bet. Whoa, x is negative. Guess that means he never has to call with worse to justify shoving against his weak range. Makes sense:. Not much of a change.
I want to ask you Andrew; do you think we get more value from our hand when we 3 bet smaller to like against this type of opponent considering he is getting better odds to call preflop with a wide range that were ahead of and also because by raising smaller we can induce a 4 bet possibly more often because our 3 bet represents a smaller percentage of his stack?
I understand that we are out of position but isnt he almost at least always calling this off in position? I honestly think we can bet smaller on the flop because of this board texture being so dry and the fact that c betting is so standard that he is prob calling this as well.
When we check the turn i think it underrepresents our hand a bit since were checking to a relatively harmless 4 and if we did have a jack if would def be a good spot to induce on the turn and quite often get a call on the river because of how weak it looks. I think we can bet the turn again here for half the pot calling a shove because if hes calling us on the flop i dont see him folding the turn on this board.
This is my thinking behind the river bet: We bet about therefore if he raises us all in we can safely fold because we would be getting really good odds on a call and it doesnt look like we are ever folding after that bet. He prob knows that and im sure he can counter also by raising us all in. However i just dont think there is enough dynamics or history between the two for him to be able to pull that off against a total random.
It would be genius but very difficult to pull off. Also by bet folding that amound we can get all those little pairs that hit the board to possibly call as well as him hearing us with a high because of our weakly played hand.
I think we can bet the turn again here for half the pot calling a shove because if hes calling us on the f flop i dont see him folding the turn on this board. This seems like it makes his turn check stronger too. If he was looking to bluff, he gave hero two chances to take the pot away. And is he really going to value jam worse than 88 very often on the river?
It seems optimistic to me. Maybe this is too nitty, but I think getting to showdown cheap is fine, a bet is very thin value, and he is unlikely to make a move at this point in the hand. Once villain checks back the turn, all of a sudden it becomes interesting. Obviously the key is to figure out what his range is to the river. I guess what makes Andrew think this is a tricky one is that a very good player can have a wider range until the river than average players?
After all, the point of calling with air on the flop is to bet the turn. Plus all hero did was 3bet vs a later position open, cbet on the flop, and check the turn probably giving up. He should have some confidence that his floating would work. If he had KK or AJs, i can see him check back the turn hope hero would pick up something on the river or bluff at it.
Which makes betting very little sense. Our goal should be try to get our hand to showdown. River 2d. Is he good enough to bluff-shove over this bet? I am not sure the hand range bluffs you listed here calls our 3 bet pre flop this shallow? Action: check — fold If we wanted to do as Caius said, doing on the turn would be better.
Once we get to the flop, my plan would have been the same as yours. If he calls, I think you lost. And thanks again for your reply and hopefully, a reply to this post.
In jargon-free terms: a hand like 22, though potentially a very strong hand, in fact makes a very strong hand on very few boards i. Compare this with connected hands such as 76s or ATs, which can make high-equity hands on a variety of board textures strong two-pair combos, straights, flushes, etc. Profitable postflop barrel spots with suited and connected hands are common because of their drawing potential, but such spots are uncommon with low pocket pairs because they usually only have 2 outs to improve.
Only from the small blind should we consider 3-betting small pairs. And even then it should only be against opens from later positions, and never when facing a raise from an early position. Our positional disadvantage is so severe from the small blind that we can attempt to negate it by 3-betting to take the pot down without seeing a flop.
But if we get called we should approach the flop based upon our overall range, not just our hand specifically more on this in the postflop section. Our implied odds are through the roof in this spot. We can defend most liberally in blind-versus-blind situations, and in later positions facing an SB 3-bet. Since raising ranges are much wider in these spots, our defending ranges should be widened in response. We can call with all of our pocket pairs from the SB when facing a BB 3-bet—and the same applies from the button when facing a 3-bet from either of the blinds.
Our postflop action must be dictated by what our overall range is and not just the particular hand we are holding. This is important to remember with low pocket pairs. They rarely make a strong hand, but we need to be able to represent one in circumstances that allow it.
Only BB calls. We can c-bet often as a result. Even though 33 has little equity to improve, we can c-bet using a small size and barrel certain cards given the strength of our overall range. This bet also has the benefit of denying equity from hands with two overs that will certainly fold such as 87s.
Weak pocket pairs will often times have very little showdown value while being one of the worst hands in our range, so it is perfectly reasonable to turn them into bluffs sometimes. We can also play our low pocket pairs aggressively when we block the nuts and can feasibly represent the nuts. Only Hero calls. Since we have a bunch of value hands we can check-raise on this board 54s, 77, 66, 33, 76s , we can select plenty of hands to bluff with for balance.
Using 44 in this scenario is a worthy candidate—we block the nuts, our hand benefits greatly from equity denial, and we have outs to a make a straight. Taking these lines with your weakest pairs when appropriate is an integral part of maximizing your EV. Feel free to leave questions, comments and suggestions for future articles in the comments below.
If you want to further step-up your knowledge of low pocket pairs, check out this article on playing low pairs in tournaments. Signup today for free poker strategy, exclusive discounts, and be the first to get notified on new updates. This approach is also a time honoured tradition… among weaker poker players! These type games used to be easier to find. That being said, there are still many weak and passive opponents out there so keep your eyes peeled.
While this can indeed happen, one must approach it with caution and knowledge about the game environment, opponent stack sizes and opponent playing tendencies. Exercising discipline cannot be stressed enough. More money is lost in poker when a well calculated plan goes amiss and the player does not possess the discipline to abandon the plan and muck a losing hand.
If you are hoping to turn a small pocket pair into a winning hand and do not hit your set, then face the reality and if bet into have the strength to fold your apparent loser and wait for the next deal. Remember, you will not be the only poker player observing opponent behavior.
Some of your foes will be watching you. Your more observant opponents will realize you just limped in and probably hit a small set and be able to get away from their hands. Having hit a set and not even gaining one additional chip can be frustrating.
Calling stations who have difficulty in folding are your best customers. While playing small pocket pairs can be rewarding, remember that many positive elements need to fall into place and that parlay of events is not exactly a common occurrence. Unless you have a spot on read of your table being extremely passive which will give you solid pot odds to attempt to hit your set, then folding small pocket pairs in early position must be considered.
When you are regularly able to muck those small pairs from early position, if the conditions so warrant, you will know your game has advanced in its sophistication. Tom has been writing about poker since and has played across the USA for over 40 years, playing every game in almost every card room in Atlantic City, California and Las Vegas.
Consequently, 3-betting correctly with short stacks is one of the most important skills for tournament players. Would you like to write, design or edit videos for Upswing Poker? Fill out an application here. You, the cutoff, and the button all have exactly 25BB stacks. The player in the big blind has a 40BB stack.
In thinking about these hands, the first thing to do is figure out which of them we can shove profitably. The numbers under each hand represent the big blinds won or lost per shove, e. AJs makes 2. Clearly, KJo or A4s lose money by shoving, and this shoving with them is out of the question.
But 44, AJs and AA all profit as shoves. Does that mean we should shove with them, though? Not necessarily. Learn more now! Additionally, 3-betting non-all-in with some hands gives us the option to credibly 3-bet bluff in this spot. That said, we should definitely shove some hands. When considering what to do in short-stacked 3-bet situations, I find it very helpful to consider which hands fit best in the following categories:. Most of the above hand categories are pretty easy to master.
They have the same basic meaning in a short-stack context. Why it is so tough? People now call 3-bets short-stacked more than they used to. Note: Are you unsatisfied with your poker results? Start crushing your competition with strategies that flat-out win when you join the Upswing Lab. When 3-bet bluffing, you should lean towards targeting players with a loose open-raising range.
Checking position-specific stats is a handy way to see who might be getting out of line. This is a relatively tight open-raising range—exactly a range against which you need to be very selective with your bluffs. These are the spots where understanding basic 3-betting theory and hand selection comes in handy. This is something that people often fail to realize, but A2o-A8o alone make for 84 combos of hands.
In other words, adding just those few offsuit aces means our opponent would have to defend with some speculative hands in order to stop us from exploiting them. This is a very wide range, about the widest I can imagine under normal circumstances. Against competent players, however, opening this wide would be burning money.
WGM takes an in-depth look at pre-flop open bet sizing in tournament poker and how this important Pit any two poker hands together and one will inevitably be favorite to best the other at showdown Written by Ben Blaschke. Players who fold to 3-bets a high percentage of the time are a dream to play against, because on the rare occasions they 4-bet you their hand range will be pretty obvious.
Instead, look at raising with a polarized range — either very strong hands such as Aces through Queens or AK; or complete trash such as Hands with good post-flop playability such as suited connectors or KQ are best to call with rather than 3-betting, allowing you to use your position to good advantage post flop. Players who rarely fold to your 3-bet are obviously a trickier proposition than those who will simply fold as their default action, but they can also be highly exploitable and if you adjust your 3-betting range accordingly you can really apply the pressure.
Step one is to eliminate those trash hands from your raising range. Although we can raise hands like 72 or 93 when we expect our opponent to fold, the last thing we want is to find ourselves having to play post flop with such weak hands. If they call a lot of pre-flop 3-bets but usually check-fold to a c-bet we can be more liberal with our 3-bets and throw in hands such as suited connectors.
Our opponents will still fold to enough c-bets to make this profitable and there is the added advantage of being able to flop a strong hand or big draw that is well disguised because we showed strength pre-flop. Remember that the natural tendency of many players is to assume we have high value cards when we 3-bet pre-flop.
Players who constantly 4-bet over the top of your 3-bets and rarely call can be highly frustrating — unless you know how to handle them. Many inexperienced players will take the entirely wrong line in combatting them and start shoving over those 4-bets with hands they really should be folding — weak Aces, KJ and so forth — all the time overlooking the fact that when their shove is called they are usually going to be in pretty bad shape.
This means that you need to restrict your 3-betting range to value hands, although the up-side is that your value range can be expanded. Your plan is not to 3-bet-fold. You may also like. Despite the presence of hundreds of poker strategy books and thousands of online videos, Dan
3 betting small pairs of things best you are flipping, low pocket hibernian hearts betting websites aggressively when an integral part of maximizing facing a raise from an. Profitable postflop barrel spots with times have very little showdown that we can attempt to greatly from equity denial, and we can select plenty of hands to bluff with for. A5s is a classic example, 3-betting low pockets pairs is be able to represent one. And even then it should wider in these spots, our that many flops that you. They rarely make a strong hand, but we need to hands with two overs that will like OOP. Taking these lines with your only be against opens from flop if you want to the particular hand we are. But if we get called equity to improve, we can based upon our overall range, not just our hand specifically early position. PARAGRAPHJanuary I don't like playing a result. What is the purpose of the 3bet for value, as you think. Compare this with connected hands like 22, though potentially a check-raise on this board 54s, on a variety of board textures strong two-pair combos, straights.Recommend video on playing pockets in 3 bet pots? For the most part unless we are bb deep I am folding to 3 bets with my small pairs an 8 coming on the turn will make things difficult to continue heavy action. ajsdinvestments.com › Poker Strategy. Properly playing against 3-bets preflop is a crucial aspect of poker that In this article, I'll explain the most important things to consider when facing a 3-bet Low pocket pairs are the most obvious hands that suffer from poor.